SELF |
44 |
||
S.B.
Karavashkin, O.N. Karavashkina |
|||
|
|||
Actually, for this
circuit the impedances 1 and 2 take the form |
|||
|
(31) |
||
In accord with (9) – (11)
and (31), the parameter el becomes a complex value |
|||
|
(32) |
||
where
, . With it the parameter el
becomes a complex function of the frequency and circuit parameters, and the
relationship between el and the unity losses its sense. As we
said before, in this case (26) is true for all the range, while (27) and (28)
loss their sense too. We see that to reveal the complex pattern of el,
we need not consider complex ladder filters. It is sufficient for it even in LC
filters simply to note the real parameters of the elements, such as inductive
parasitic impedance, capacitive parasitic impedance, and sometimes the
connecting wire resistance. In all these cases we can apply (26) to all the
range. And if the parasitic parameters influence is small, this expression
will simply describe the regularity, practically identical to (26) – (28) for
an ideal filter. At the same time, a clear differentiation of the pass and
stop bands and the calculation simplicity are the merits of the system (26) –
(28). For the case of complex el the calculation essentially complicates
when real and imaginary parts of (26) separating, and it is difficult to
determine the boundary frequency from the solution itself. In the studied
specific problem, the input impedance Rin can be easy
determined from (26): |
|||
|
(33) |
||
where |
|||
|
|||
The
typical form of the amplitude (a) and phase (b) of the input impedance with
respect to frequency and load Rload is shown in Fig. 6. First
of all we see that for the finite ladder filter the amplitude and phase of
the input impedance has the resonance form. And the number of peaks is
different at Rload < R0 and Rload
> R0. It is caused by the fact that at small Rload
the filter behaves as the shorted and consisting of (n + 1)
calculation nodes, and at large Rload the input resistance
corresponds to an unloaded filter consisting of n nodes, which is in
full correspondence with the above analysis of the solutions (26) – (28)
transformation. With the growing load impedance the phase characteristic also
transforms, up to changing the sign at definite bands. This transformation of
the amplitude and phase characteristics takes place at a quite narrow range,
where the values Rload are lower or higher than the
impedance R0 that is equal in this calculation to 159,15
Ohm (the plots at this value of the load resistance are shown in red). One
can see that with growing Rload from zero to R0,
the peak amplitudes fall, and at Rload = R0
reach some minimum. With the following increase of the impedance, the
resonance peaks at the low and medium bands displace, the first resonance
peak vanishes, and already at Rload » 600 Ohm (for the
present circuit parameters) the resonance frequencies location stabilises at
the new number of the resonance frequencies. Further only the resonance peaks
themselves grow. And this last concerns to a large extent to the
amplitude-frequency characteristic. The resonance peaks on the
phase-frequency characteristic reach fast the saturation amplitude not
exceeding /2 for
the first peak that determines the limits of the input impedance phase
variation. |
|||
Contents / 35 /36 / 37 / 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 / 42 / 43 / 44 / 45 / 46 / 47 /